Why hackers moved from goldiloader to ar_lazy_preload
1 hacker described this switch in public comments. Their words, with links to the originals.
What hackers said about the move
“there's ar_lazy_preloader[0] or goldiloader[1] which fix many N+1s by keeping track of a context”riffraff, 2025-10-03original comment ↗
Use goldiloader? Get alerted when hackers criticize it.
Tell us the tools in your stack. When hackers start criticizing one of them, or moving to an alternative, you will hear about it first.
goldiloader vs ar_lazy_preload
| goldiloader | ar_lazy_preload | |
|---|---|---|
| Hackers who recommend | 1 | 1 |
| Hackers who criticize | 0 | 0 |
| Moved away from it | 1 | 1 |
| Moved to it | 1 | 1 |
Counts are distinct hackers in the sampled comments, not market share.
Criticism of goldiloader
No further criticism of goldiloader captured yet.
Praise for ar_lazy_preload
No further praise for ar_lazy_preload captured yet.